Expansion liquidity — new RVH pairs on Robinhood 2M RVH seed · 100% WETH The Scattering · 50% WETH The Turning
Staking Contract
Activates at 10% burned · Receives DAO pool trading fees Phase 1: 1.5M RVH emission · Phase 2: LP swap fee revenue
The Scattering
0% – 24% Burned · intoTheVoid() cooldown 4–14h
◆0.5% LP liquidity removed per call
◆100% WETH → owner → DAO Pools
The Turning
25% – 49% Burned · intoTheVoid() cooldown 14–24h
◆0.5% LP liquidity removed per call
◆50% WETH → DAO Pools · 50% → buyback & burn
The Devouring
50% – 89% Burned · intoTheVoid() cooldown 24–38h
◆0.5% LP liquidity removed per call
◆100% WETH → buyback RVH → burn to 0x0
feedTheRaven() — 1h cooldown
Collects LP swap fees · executes 3× buy/sell loop · burns residual RVH Active across all phases. Continues into The Stillness.
The Stillness
At ≥ 90% supply burned · intoTheVoid() reverts forever
Token flow
The Scattering routing
The Devouring / fees
Terminal path
Reading the chain
Why do explorers show ~50%+ held by "top wallets"?
Wallet apps and explorers (Robinhood Wallet, Bubblemaps, Blockscout) rank addresses by raw token balance —
they don't distinguish a personal wallet from a smart contract. Because RVH's liquidity and staking rewards
are protocol-owned and locked in contracts rather than held by individuals, those contracts show up as some
of the largest "wallets" by design. That's the opposite of a red flag: it means no single person can move
that RVH.
RVHStakingPoolHolds users' staked RVH plus the unclaimed reward reserve. Verified on Blockscout — each staker can withdraw their own stake at any time.0xAc558b558E228DE033Cd97C580618C4403CB05a6 ↗
The only address in the top holders controlled by a single person is the deployer wallet, disclosed above at
a fixed 5% of supply. Everything else in the "top wallets" figure is locked liquidity or staking contracts —
both verified, both open to public inspection.